Our government's actions on the Iran/Israel/Gaza conflict are only possible because of our persistent ignorance, by design, of the history of both Iran and Israel. It is all about corporate power and profit.
Iran/Israel/Gaza conflict
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
In the discourse surrounding the Iran/Israel/Gaza conflict, a disturbing trend emerges—a trend of sanctioned ignorance perpetuated by media narratives and leadership rhetoric that distorts public understanding and awareness. I probe the underpinnings of such narratives, exploring how they contribute to a one-dimensional view of international conflicts and the historical amnesia about the roles various countries, including the United States, have played in shaping today's geopolitical landscape.
The rhetoric utilized by governments and amplified by the media often simplifies complex international issues into binary good versus evil narratives. Such simplifications severely undermine the public's ability to grasp the nuanced realities of global politics. For instance, the demonization of Iran as an "evil empire" disregards the country’s complex history, particularly the pivotal 1953 coup orchestrated by the United States and the United Kingdom, which reshaped Iran's political trajectory. This historical event is seldom acknowledged in mainstream discussions, leading to a gross mischaracterization of Iran’s political and social dynamics.
Similarly, the portrayal of Israel as a unilateral beacon of democracy in the Middle East ignores the contentious and problematic aspects of its foundation and ongoing policy towards Palestine. The creation of Israel in 1948 and the subsequent displacement of thousands of Palestinians are rarely discussed with the gravity they deserve. This omission serves to justify ongoing support for Israel without a critical examination of its policies and actions, which often contravene international law and human rights standards.
Media coverage and political discourse in the United States frequently reflect a lack of historical awareness or selective memory. This is not merely a matter of poor education but a deliberate omission and manipulation of information. Such manipulation ensures that the public remains unaware or misinformed about the United States' historical interventions in foreign governments, particularly in the Middle East and Latin America. By controlling the narrative, those in power can manipulate public opinion to support current and future geopolitical strategies that benefit a few at the expense of many.
This engineered ignorance extends beyond mere omission. For example, the American public's understanding of the economic underpinnings of many conflicts, particularly oil-related ones, remains minimal. The discourse surrounding oil-rich countries often revolves around their supposed inherent corruption or tyranny while obscuring the Western interests that have historically exploited these regions' resources. The 1953 Iranian coup is a case in point, where the democratically elected leader Mohammad Mosaddegh was overthrown after he nationalized the oil industry, which British and American companies had controlled. The long-term consequences of such actions include fostering environments that can lead to authoritarian regimes and unstable regions, which are then depicted as inherently flawed or hostile.
Furthermore, the profitability of war, particularly for the military-industrial complex, is a critical yet often overlooked element. The continuous sale of arms and military equipment, justified under the guise of national security, perpetuates conflict and destabilizes regions for financial gain. Political rhetoric that paints complex international relationships in broad strokes of good versus evil ignoring the economic interests that often drive foreign policy decisions, reinforces this cycle.
In the case of the recent escalations between Israel and Iran, the narrative focuses narrowly on aggression and retaliation, with little context about the longstanding geopolitical tensions that have led to current circumstances. For instance, the attack on the Iranian consulate in Syria by Israeli forces is portrayed as a defensive measure rather than an aggressive violation of international norms, which could be seen as an act of war. The lack of nuanced reporting on such incidents contributes to a skewed perception of the conflict, where historical aggressions are ignored, and victims are often blamed for their plight.
As progressives, it is crucial to challenge these narratives and promote a more informed understanding of international affairs among the public. This involves critiquing the content and slant of current news coverage and revisiting and teaching historical contexts that are frequently sanitized or erased. True progress in international relations will only be achieved through a well-informed public that can hold its leaders accountable for their actions on the global stage.
Therefore, as global citizens, it is incumbent upon us to seek knowledge, challenge misleading narratives, and strive for a nuanced understanding of world affairs. Only then can we hope to influence our governments towards more ethical, thoughtful, and peace-oriented foreign policies. The path to change is paved with the bricks of knowledge and critical engagement, not the sands of convenient ignorance. To move forward, we must look back and learn from history, ensuring that our future actions promote justice and peace rather than perpetuating cycles of violence and exploitation.
RELEASED: My fifth book, titled “Tribulations of an Afro-Latino Caribbean Man: Racism Didn't Stop My Smile, Hope, Or Journey Forward,” is now live and shipping. Check it out here.
Are you interested in the Progressive work we are doing on the terrestrial radio, streaming, and social media platforms? Check it out here.