Skip to main content

Lots of gun talk today, in anticipation of the announcement from the White House. Greg Dworkin joined us for a discussion of the crazy-ass NRA ad everybody is talking about, the prospects for legislation, and the politics & political coverage of executive action, including the descent into Jay Rosen's "Church of the Savvy," where the gun policy issue becomes one about "perceptions," covered horserace style. Also in today's show: A discussion of the history of debt ceiling votes in Congress, including the now dormant "Gephardt Rule." Firearms Derangement Syndrome, and the asymmetrical ways in which the left and right play "constitutional hardball" on gun issues. Armando returned to the "air" for a discussion of the debt ceiling, the death of The Coin, and Speaker Boehner's loss of control over the House. And a reading of Bush II Treasury official Tony Fratto's Twitter explanation of why simply "prioritizing" payments won't really stave off default.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Whether the issue is aggression or deprivation, (0+ / 0-)

    we have a tendency to focus on the results for the victims and maybe the act itself, but the agents most often get a pass.
    Perhaps that's because the citizens of the United States are still convinced that aggressive behavior is a good thing. Or perhaps we are so fixated on death that any lesser abuse gets ignored.
    Now, it is possible that shooter killing lots of innocent and inoffensive people is engaged in a one-time event for which there was no precedent. But, I think it is more likely that killing people represents an escallation of abuse that, if we were paying close attention, could be nipped in the bud.
    That we do not pay the kind of attention we should is, to a large extent, the consequence of our legislative representatives in Congress making the resources required to train and hire professional people artificially scarce. They don't want to help, even though that's what they are hired and paid to do. Indeed, a goodly number of members of Congress seem to get off on the mayhem being perpetrated throughout the nation in order to justify their own "protective" role, which largely involves putting more restrictions on the citizenry, as if we were domestic stock to be stabled.
    Why are children the most recent targets? Because they are vulnerable, unarmed, and confined like sitting ducks. Aslo, children have no civil rights and they don't vote. Some people always have to have some group to deprive of their rights. Since the attacks on gays and migrants and native Americans have pretty much back-fired, there's little left but the very old and the young.

    We organize governments to deliver services and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 11:17:31 AM PST

  •  Armando states the PCS/ Art.4 case exactly right (0+ / 0-)

    PBO needs a fallback position in the likely event that the House nutcase R's don't do the right thing.

    Warren is neither a Clintonesque triangulator nor an Obamaesque conciliator. She is a throwback to a more combative progressive tradition, and her candidacy is a test of whether that approach can still appeal to voters.-J. Toobin "New Yorker"

    by chuck utzman on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 02:36:08 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site