Skip to main content

For some time now, I've tried to pin a predictable set of principles to the radical right Tea Party. It seems to be changing all the time. But in an interview this week, it finally all seemed to click.

I’ve often wondered what makes the Tea Party tick. Time and time again, I’ve tried to crystallize the group’s ideology, and over the last three years it has been exceedingly difficult to do because they have would I would call “ideology creep.”

It’s a play on the old “mission creep” military term that of course describes constantly morphing objectives once a conflict is underway. We have seen that one in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Now ideology creep has found its way into the Tea Party. What was once an Astroturf movement largely promoted by Fox News in response to the Affordable Care Act has sharply turned into a radicalization of the right.

To be sure, there are conservatives of conscience. They are increasingly hard to find in the cacophony of the radical right-wing blogosphere, but they are still around. I don’t agree with them, but they have legitimate ideas about how the country should be governed.

Those people should have a seat at the table. I believe they are honest brokers. We have seen them in government before. I believe Ronald Reagan was a conservative of conscience, and I also believe that a man like that could not find a voice in what the Tea Party driven radical right has become.

Place Reagan on the list with Eisenhower, Ford, and Dole. Put Jeb Bush there too. He had enough sense to know that in the current GOP climate he would not be able to get the nomination for President, so he chose not to run in this cycle.

He would have been drowned out. He would have become another victim of the radicalization of the party that was once dominated by William Buckley, symbolized by Ronald Reagan and currently championed by guys like George Will.

Those minds have lost traction. The party now finds its moral compass in the rants of Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh. The new faces of the party are Michele Bachmann, Allen West, and Todd Akin.

Who are these people? What is their ideology?

What was once an anti-tax party largely driven by Tom Delay and Grover Norquist has now lost its way. In fact, the new faces of the Tea Party hysterical right have turned on Norquist.  

Back in July, when Michele Bachmann floated her absurd claim about the Muslim Brotherhood infiltrating the US, she cited a film produced by a right-wing national security think tank. The film accused Norquist of helping the Muslim Brotherhood gain access in the Bush Administration.

Now that ideology creep has moved the Tea Party away from anti-tax to a pro-paranoia mindset, what drives them?

To a large degree, they are driven purely by a desire to defeat President Obama. It’s no secret, and most of its members would freely acknowledge it.

But it has to be more than that. There are Tea Party members in state legislatures around the country with very little pull in what happens in Washington.

Where is their ideological core?

While watching an interview with Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) on Friday night, it clicked.

Todd Akin is her radical Tea Party opponent in the race for one of Missouri’s Senate seats. His policy positions locked it in.

The Tea Party is simply the party of denial.

They deny that people are victims, they deny people have been aggrieved in their own country, they deny people have been neglected.

Denial: the strong have no problems and the weak aren’t their problem.

“There are no victims” could be their bumper sticker.

Think of Akin’s positions and comments for a minute.

The “legitimate rape” story seems to indicate a denial of the victimization and trauma that a woman undergoes in the horror of the most personal violation that can be endured.

Akin opposes fair pay for women as well, indicating that he doesn’t believe that someone can be aggrieved when they do not receive equal pay for equal work.

He also opposes a sex offender registry list, because clearly children can’t be victims when they live near convicted pedophiles who may have the desire to repeat offend.

Akin also supports building the Keystone pipeline, because the environment can’t be a victim.

Back in 2003, he also chose to vote against funding for programs that help homeless children. They’re not victims either, I guess. Homeless children! Really?

See the pattern?

Pick any Tea Party lawmaker and look at how they vote. Find the bills that protect an aggrieved party, help a victim of some kind, or try to right a wrong that has been a part of our American institutions.

No. No. No.

In December 1773, people in Boston boarded ships and threw British-taxed tea into the harbor. The incident was one of several events that ultimately led to the American Revolution.

It also became the inspiration for the name of the new, radical, no-victims Tea Party more than 200 years later.

In 1787, the founders that the Tea Party often cite gathered together to write the US Constitution. What began as a backlash against taxes in 1773 had ideology creep. It crept into a fully-formed vision of what our country should be.

By 1791, those founders sent the first ten amendments to the states for ratification. The Bill of Rights was important— it was an acknowledgement from the founders that there are people who might be aggrieved, neglected, or victimized.

In just the First Amendment, think of all the victims, the aggrieved and neglected that were addressed.

Then put it in the Tea Party’s “There are no victims” bumper sticker concept.

Freedom of religion: it should mean just that, but in Colorado, GOP State Senator Kevin Grantham thinks it might be a good idea to ban building mosques.

Freedom of assembly: it should mean you can ban together to demonstrate, yet the Tea Party doesn’t think that applies to Occupy Protestors.

Freedom of petition: people should be allowed to petition their government, and utilize their protected free speech to say what they think. Ask Illinois Congressman Joe Walsh how he feels about Sandra Fluke being able to testify before Congress and champion reproductive rights.

Since 1791, our founders and those who followed them recognized there were other groups that were aggrieved and victimized. The Thirteenth Amendment outlawed slavery and the Nineteenth gave women the right to vote.

The Twenty-Fourth Amendment gives people the right to vote regardless of their ability to pay a poll tax, which of course is another one that the Tea Party throws out the window as they move to impose their obscene Voter ID laws on people and then ask them to go pay for the ID.

Each of those amendments acknowledges that there was a group of Americans at the time of their ratification that had been aggrieved.

The founders and their successors knew that while all men were created equal, not all men and women are treated that way. They tried to fix it.

The Tea Party has that glaring disconnect. They will agree that all men are created equal, they just don’t think that men or women, minority or not, have the right to be treated that way.

The party of no taxes has morphed into the party of no grievances, no sense of community, and no optimism.

The Tea Party in a nutshell: not my problem.

The problem is that the Tea Party exists in America, where people do have problems, people are victims of wrongs that need to be righted, and many Americans do have a sense of community and a desire to help others that extends beyond lines of faith, ethnicity, gender, and party lines.

The Tea Party doesn’t get that. They think they share America’s values, but they couldn’t be further from them.

“No victims,” they cry. “Americans need to look out for themselves.”

Hungry? Get a job.

Homeless? Your fault.

Raped? Probably wasn’t legitimate.

Need medical care, education, or help to make ends meet? Trade a chicken for it.

The funny thing is that the men who followed the real Boston Tea Party would have never said any of that.

That’s why they wrote a Constitution that the Tea Party waves but never bother to read.

Most of us have read it.

We get it. The Tea Party doesn’t.

That’s why the Tea Party is losing.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  The tea party is nothing more than the latest (11+ / 0-)

    incarnation of the John Birch society. It is the latest label for people who are

    racist
    sexist
    homophobic
    greedy
    nativist
    religiously intolerant
    militaristic
    scared

    That's who the tea party is. It's really very simple.

    •  Yep, factor in racism (5+ / 0-)

      I think the diarist got it largely correct, but needs to factor in racism and xenophobia.

      Wealthy donors started the Tea Party, but the "foot soldiers" who were attracted to the brand were the republicans who felt the republican party was not being racist enough.  In the Tea Party, they found a place to give unrestrained expression to their racist thinking.

      For the Tea Party, the greatest offense of Obama is not his liberalism, or the ACA, or that he mentioned taxes on the wealthy.  

      It is his black skin.

      "The fool doth think he is wise: the wise man knows himself to be a fool" - W. Shakespeare

      by Hugh Jim Bissell on Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 08:43:18 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I've a much different theory. (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    David54, hankepton, devtob, Vetwife

    I think that the people who came streaming out with the tri-corner hats and snake flags are folks who reached middle age and realized, "Damn, now that I think about it, those hippies looked like they were having FUN!"

    We've been wondering how to get through the clutter and reach low-information voters. Mitt haz it.

    by Crashing Vor on Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 07:50:48 AM PDT

  •  What makes the tea party (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Dirtandiron, The Hamlet, a2nite

    a tick?
    Probably the fact that it consists of bloated blood suckers who will gladly kill off their host for their own personal benefit.
    Tipped and recced.

    You can make a lovely hat out of previously-used aluminum foil.

    by reddbierd on Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 07:50:50 AM PDT

  •  I think bitterness is what makes them tick (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ahumbleopinion, devtob, a2nite

    The ones I know all seem motivated by the same philosophy.  Every one of them seems to think they are the only one who gets out of bed in the morning and does anything productive. Everyone else is getting a free ride. And they always blame someone they consider beneath them somehow. It's always the fault of "the coloreds", or teachers, or Jews, or someone. It's never their fault. Or the fault of the wealthy who actually make the decisions.

    Where are all the jobs, Boehner?

    by Dirtandiron on Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 08:05:14 AM PDT

  •  Actually, they threw tea that was NOT taxed (6+ / 0-)

    Their complaint was that the tea in the colonies was taxed, but the tea that was sold by the British East India Company was tax-exempted, so it was unfair competition.  The colonists were angered because the BEIC was not taxed enough!

    Of course, the Tea Partiers have no grasp of history, or the internet, or else they wouldn't have called themselves teabaggers.

  •  The anti-abortion, religious right zealots who (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hankepton, devtob, Dirtandiron

    were the final, last-ditch constituency of GWB were desperate for a "re-branding" after the disaster of 2007-8.
    They latched onto the "tea party" at the beginning of the Health Care debate and the nomination of Justice Sotomayor.
    Fox and the Kochs and Dick Armey jumped in with the astroturfing.

    There was a fundie/evangelical stream of hustlers who worked on Southern radio, and who largely opposed desegregation and federal intervention. They quickly moved into television.
    They latched onto the "abortion" issue and "social issues" in general in response to the sexual revolution.

    There was a concomitant group of rabid anti-communists, racists, fear and loathing types represented by the John Birch Society.
    A Venn diagram would show the fundie/anti-abortion crowd and the John Birch crowd largely overlapping, but not completely. Not all Birchers were also fundie/anti-abortionists and vice versa.
    Over the years these networks grew and the flim flam industries pandering to them, the televangelists, etc. grew in wealth and power.
    Then communism died, and there was no one left for the Birchers to attack, so they started going after Dems and moderate Republicans. Abortion opposition exists as the goose that laid the golden egg, and they latched onto that. With the Bush disaster and the election of Obama, they've basically moved into a hysterical frenzy. Even though denial of social services, disgruntlement about taxes, denial of climate change , etc. are involved, abortion rights continues to be at or near the center of gravity for these groups.

     

    You can't make this stuff up.

    by David54 on Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 09:08:39 AM PDT

  •  it's all about "victimization" (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hankepton, CFAmick, devtob, a2nite, Dirtandiron

    in my opinion. Tea Partiers, by definition, are trying to put themselves on the moral highground, like the original Revolutionary era tea party, by trying to convince everyone (including themselves, it seems) that they are, somehow, victims. Victims of everyone. Victims of a system that takes from them to help others. Victims of the national news media and mainstream political thinkers who they think are "pandering" to those received governmental benefits. Victims of alleged "reverse discrimination" (yet another delusion). Victims of a society that, in their world, rewards the poor and punishes the rich and the middle class. Victims of a society that mandates them to do things they don't like...like paying taxes and getting health insurance. Victims of an oppressive federal government that...somehow...oppresses them (with no evidence).

    They have, somehow, convinced themselves that the slaves of the 18th century had it easy compared to them.
    (In their world...well...all those slaves had  food and a roof over their head...and didn't have to pay taxes...so what did they have to complain about?)

  •  Predators require prey (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    devtob, hankepton, a2nite, Dirtandiron

    "A cynical, mercenary, demagogic press will produce in time a people as base as itself." - Joseph Pulitzer

    by CFAmick on Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 10:35:15 AM PDT

  •  well said! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Dirtandiron

    It is interesting:  they espouse "taking personal responsibility" (sounds so good and noble!) while at the same time they usually put the blame for their own perceived failings onto someone or something else.  

    People of a different color are taking their jobs (read: power).  Big bad government is taking away their rights (read: power).  Gays are to blame for family problems and teachers are the cause of failing schools.  Always the "other".  

    They project onto others their own anxieties about not being able to make it on their own.  They were taught they could make it on their own, and so on through the generations.  Our entire society is BUILT ON GUILT.  They feel, deep down, like they aren't good enough (which isn't true, we are all good enough) and believing that is too painful... so they blame someone else while at the same time espousing the same bullshit social darwinism that has been screwing with our minds for generations.  So many people are scared to death of just sharing and caring.  

    We need to bring back pride in sharing and caring.  We need to focus on wonderful solutions to our problems -- and keep hammering away at that, until it becomes obvious to everyone that sharing and caring is SAFE and not a threat to your own security and sense of self. We need to reform government and all structures of society to be based on healthy values, until it becomes obvious that this is the way that makes sense.

  •  I don't know how to start a diary.. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    rja

    But this from Joe Walsh....

    http://www.dailyherald.com/...

    Joe meets with local Muslims. And insults them!!

    The Ghost of Tom Joad http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jVZHCUbS4U

    by Illinois IRV on Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 05:06:16 PM PDT

  •  Koch boys = Tea party (0+ / 0-)

    w/o chuckie and davey no tea party.  tea party is a convenient name for a mob bought by the crazy koch's.  They don't now and never did have a coherent thought process for any of the koch's thrusts.

  •  They have no core principles... (0+ / 0-)

    they just hate Obama.

    Because they are bigots.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site